2026
Data-driven nonlinear aerodynamics models with certifiably optimal boundedness properties
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
The Problem: Data-driven models of fluid flows often work well for short-term predictions but eventually diverge or predict physically impossible behavior over long periods. Without explicit constraints, standard modeling algorithms tend to produce equations that are mathematically and physically inconsistent with the laws of fluid dynamics.
The Goal: To combine data-driven modeling with optimization methods to build simplified, nonlinear models that are mathematically guaranteed to stay bounded indefinitely, while maintaining a structure consistent with the governing fluid equations. In other words, we want to build a model that captures the behaviors present in the data while being (provably) physically accurate.
The Outcome: We developed a framework that leverages our “Trapping-SDP” approach to enforce strict physical bounds on a model’s long-term behavior. We proved its success on a complex, separated airflow over an airfoil, a scenario where standard learned models almost always fail.
Practical Airflow Modeling and Control from Data: A Physics-Informed Approach
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota
This dissertation develops physics-informed and data-driven methods for modeling, understanding, and controlling nonlinear aerodynamic flows. The work focuses on building reduced-order models that remain physically meaningful over long times, identifying sparse perturbations that strongly influence nonlinear flow evolution, and using time-frequency/phase-based analysis to understand separated-flow response to actuation.
When and Where: Timing and Placement of Pulses for Control of a 2D Separated Flow Over a Cambered Airfoil
AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum
The Problem: Flow separation severely degrades aerodynamic performance by reducing lift and increasing drag. Modern pulse-jet actuators can alter these separated flows, but while finding the best physical location for an actuator has been widely studied, knowing the exact timing to fire the pulse within a natural vortex-shedding cycle remains largely unexplored.
The Goal: To map out how the sub-cycle timing and physical location of a pulsed jet independently and collectively influence separation dynamics and transient lift over a cambered airfoil. In other words, we wish to perform a parametric study to identify where and when the airfoil system is most sensitive to actuation.
The Outcome: Using continuous wavelet and Lagrangian flow analyses, we discovered that small temporal adjustments in pulse timing can radically flip the flow from lift reduction to transient reattachment. Leveraging this timing-dependent vortex interlocking mechanism allowed us to identify a timing and placement for actuation that gave up to a 30% enhancement in lift.
2025
A Convex Optimization Approach to Compute Trapping Regions for Lossless Quadratic Systems
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
The Problem: Many complex systems in atmospheric science and fluid dynamics feature “lossless” quadratic interactions. While these systems are stable if they possess a mathematical “trapping region” (a boundary that all forecasts eventually converge inside), previous methods to find these regions relied on non-convex optimization, which produced overly conservative boundary estimates.
The Goal: To develop a convex optimization approach to mathematically prove the existence of these trapping regions and calculate the tightest possible physical boundaries for the system.
The Outcome: We introduced a convex semidefinite programming (SDP) framework that certifies whether a trapping region exists. If it does, our second optimization step calculates the tightest, least-conservative bounding radius possible.
An optimization framework for analyzing nonlinear stability due to sparse finite-amplitude perturbations
Physical Review Fluids
The Problem: Traditional stability analysis can find the “worst-case” disturbances that trigger instability growth in fluid flows by identifying the sensitivities inherent to the system. However, these solutions typically require injecting energy across every single state or physical location of the system simultaneously. In real-world engineering, perturbing a whole system is rarely practical or possible, making this impractical for flow control.
The Goal: To find out where we can “kick” a nonlinear dynamical system to get the “biggest bang for our buck”. In other words, given a limited energy budget, can we get a large response in the system by targeting only a small number of locations or modes rather than distributing that energy throughout? The goal is then to find a (sparse) subset of states where we can apply a finite-amplitude perturbation such that we use minimal input energy to get the largest possible response.
The Outcome: Tested on a fluid shear flow model, our framework identified that kicking a small subset (or even just one vortical mode) yielded a similar energy amplification as a fully distributed perturbation. By isolating these highly sensitive single points of failure, the framework provides a roadmap for designing highly efficient, targeted flow-control strategies.
2022
A low-order nonlinear model of a stalled airfoil from data: Exploiting sparse regression with physical constraints
AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum
The Problem: Data-driven modeling methods (like Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics, or SINDy) can identify simplified equations for fluid flows, but they typically only track certain abstract flow states rather than engineering metrics of interest, such as aerodynamic lift. Furthermore, without physical constraints, standard data-fitting algorithms tend to violate basic energy laws over long periods, leading to fragile models that fail when tested outside of their narrow training conditions.
The Goal: To pair a physics-constrained, energy-preserving model of a stalled airfoil’s wake with a dedicated nonlinear output equation. In other words, the goal is to build a low-order model that tracks the physics of the flow field accurately over long periods, while also mapping those states directly to a predictive equation for the aerodynamic lift coefficient.
The Outcome: We successfully identified and cross-validated a compact, coupled model that accurately predicts lift under off-design and transient conditions. By forcing the underlying flow model to strictly obey physical energy conservation and directly embedding the lift calculation as a matched output equation, the resulting framework predicts aerodynamic forces with significantly greater accuracy and robustness than standard, unconstrained approaches.
2019
Evaluating the Accuracy of Conventional Drag Prediction and Validation Methods for Small Electric UAVs
University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program
The Problem: This work builds on the prior 2018 study (which proved that traditional methods underpredict small UAV drag by up to 71%). While high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can simulate these low Reynolds number flight environments, CFD is expensive, time-consuming, and computationally restrictive for most drone developers, leaving them without a simple way to predict performance.
The Goal: To take the conventional Component Drag Build-Up Method (CDBM) and modify it to account for the unique physics of small UAVs, providing developers with a more accurate analytical tool that can be validated via simple, low-cost flight testing.
The Outcome: By analyzing three distinct drone geometries, we built a modified CDBM+ flight testing framework. The models achieve accuracy by modeling the UAV boundary layer as fully turbulent, utilizing Hoerner form-factors, adding mathematical penalties for un-filleted bluff noses, and incorporating wind-tunnel data to account for the resistance of windmilling propellers. Unpowered glide tests proved effective as a validation tool, with the newly predicted drag curves falling within the experimental 95% error bounds of the flight data.
2018
Evaluating the Impact of Parasitic Drag on the Accuracy of Endurance Predictions
University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program
The Problem: When calculating how long a battery-powered, fixed-wing UAV can stay in the air, engineers rely on mathematical models to estimate aerodynamic drag. The standard approach is to employ the Component Drag Build-Up Method (CDBM), which uses empirical formulas designed for full-scale aircraft operating at high Reynolds numbers. Because small electric UAVs are tiny and fly slowly, they operate at much lower Reynolds numbers where viscous forces dominate, meaning assumptions about a “clean” body and low component interference fall apart.
The Goal: Experimentally test a small electric UAV using unpowered glide tests to back out its true parasitic drag curve, and determine if standard conventional drag estimation formulas are accurate enough to make valid flight endurance predictions.
The Outcome: Tested on an Eflite Ultra-Stick 25e model aircraft, the study revealed a gap: the standard CDBM underpredicted actual parasitic drag by an average error of 71%. Because the power required to overcome drag scales cubically with velocity, this underestimation means that conventional aircraft formulas overestimate battery life, and must be used cautiously when obtaining endurance predictions for small UAVs.